C.I.D.
S
1.
19.1.38
F.O. no F 622/19/10
Rej (102)
O
53858/10/37 trans
trans craft
craft ld. 66
2
Tokyo
1
conson.
(See 96 on 53838/10/37).
(92 on above
file).
This the
Japanese do not deny.
The facts of the attack on the Chinese
customs vessel have been fully reported to us in a
despatch from Hong Kong. We have also received a
copy of the telegram to Tokyo instructing the
Ambassador to protest to the Japanese Government.
The Japanese reply to our note seems to me
Whether or not the Chinese
clearly unsatisfactory.
vessel was taken in tow by the Japanese warship
seems to me to be immaterial. The essential fact is
that an attack was made on it while in British
territorial waters and that a capture was subsequently
made in those waters (i.e. the boat either
moved off under her own steam, or was towed off under
the Japanese flag). The fact that sailors from the
Japanese vessel landed in Hong Kong territory is
denied by the Japanese Govt. There is also an unpleas-
ant ring about the statement that "investigation of
the enemy vessel brooked no delay".
The Japanese apologise for the incident,
however, and state that those responsible have been
dealt with appropriately in accordance with the law.
The F.O. draft telegram takes note of this and refers
to two points not covered in the Japanese reply,
namely, that the Chinese vessel moved off flying the
Japanese flag and that H.M.G. remain in no doubt that
Japanese sailors did in fact land in Hong Kong
territory.
Latharent
They also refer to theure of the
Japanese Govt. to inform their naval authorities of
declared
their policy in regard to the customs administration.
I see no objection to the terms of the draft,
I venture to suggest that it might have made more of
though
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.